The Impact of Immigration on Robotics and Productivity: Insights from few countries

Insights from Denmark reveal that easy access to migrant workers may discourage investment in robotics, potentially affecting productivity growth. The United Kingdom is investing in agricultural automation while facing controversy over wage rules for immigrant workers. Canada's immigration policies have raised concerns about the influx of low-skilled workers and its impact on productivity. Striking a balance between immigration, automation, and productivity remains a challenge for policymakers and businesses in these countries.

3/23/20243 min read

man in green jacket and blue denim jeans walking on green grass field during daytime
man in green jacket and blue denim jeans walking on green grass field during daytime

In recent years, the relationship between immigration, automation, and productivity has become a topic of great interest and debate. Various countries have taken different approaches to address these interconnected issues. This article explores the insights gained from Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Canada, shedding light on the complex dynamics between immigration, automation, and productivity.

Denmark: Balancing Migrant Workers and Robotics Investment

Denmark, known for its flexible labor market, has experienced an interesting correlation between easy access to migrant workers and reduced investment in robotics. A study conducted in 2022 revealed that companies with readily available migrant labor tend to rely less on automation. This finding suggests that the availability of a low-cost workforce may discourage businesses from investing in expensive robotic technologies. However, it is important to note that this correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Other factors, such as industry-specific requirements and the nature of the tasks involved, may also influence the decision-making process.

In Denmark, the challenge lies in striking a balance between utilizing migrant workers and embracing automation. While the availability of migrant labor may provide short-term cost advantages, it may hinder the long-term potential for productivity growth through automation. Policymakers and businesses need to carefully consider the trade-offs and implications of their decisions, taking into account the specific needs and characteristics of their industries.

United Kingdom: Agricultural Automation and Controversial Wage Rules

In the United Kingdom, the government has been actively investing in agricultural technologies to accelerate automation in the sector. Recognizing the potential benefits of automation in improving efficiency and reducing reliance on manual labor, the UK government has made significant efforts to promote the adoption of agricultural technologies. However, their plan to remove the rule allowing companies to pay immigrant workers 20% less than the standard wage for certain positions has faced criticism from agricultural lobbies.

The agricultural lobbies argue that while farmers readily adopt available technologies, robots are not yet suitable for fruit and vegetable picking due to the delicate nature of the task. However, it is worth noting that in the Czech Republic, robots are successfully used for strawberry picking, challenging the claim that automation is not feasible in the agricultural sector. The debate surrounding wage rules and automation in the UK highlights the complexities of finding a balance between labor costs, technological advancements, and the needs of the agricultural industry.

The UK government's investment in agricultural technologies demonstrates a commitment to embracing automation. However, the controversy surrounding wage rules emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the specific requirements and limitations of different industries. Striking a balance between labor costs, technological advancements, and the unique demands of the agricultural sector is crucial for promoting productivity and competitiveness.

Canada: Immigration Policies and Productivity Concerns

In Canada, the government's immigration policies have undergone significant changes in recent years. The shift towards admitting highly skilled foreign students and low-skilled temporary workers has raised concerns about the impact on productivity. Economists have observed that the influx of low-skilled workers may flood the market with cheap labor, potentially harming productivity and competitiveness.

As a consequence of years of record immigration, the economic output per capita in Canada has declined compared to 2018. This decline suggests that the country's reliance on low-skilled workers has negatively affected overall productivity. Balancing the need for a diverse workforce with the imperative to maintain productivity levels is a challenge that policymakers in Canada continue to grapple with.

The Canadian experience highlights the importance of aligning immigration policies with productivity goals. While attracting a diverse range of talent is beneficial, policymakers must carefully consider the long-term implications of their decisions on productivity. Striking a balance between attracting highly skilled workers and maintaining productivity levels is crucial for sustaining economic growth and competitiveness.

The relationship between immigration, automation, and productivity is a complex and multifaceted issue. The experiences of Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Canada provide valuable insights into the challenges and considerations associated with these dynamics. While easy access to migrant labor may discourage investment in automation, it is crucial for governments to strike a balance that promotes productivity and supports the competitiveness of businesses. Finding the right approach requires careful consideration of the specific needs and circumstances of each country.